My Thoughts on Acell and PRP

About two years ago there was buzz on the web about something called Acell or more specifically Acell “Matrix”. Acell is a company that has been making wound healing products primarily for the veterinarian industry for years. After a lawsuit between Acell and University of Pennsylvania was ruled (Acell won) Acell was allowed to move forward with the human version of their “Matrix” technology. In short Matrix, when applied properly, was supposed to regenerate not only human tissue but also hair bearing skin instead of scar tissue in even severe wounds. There was some impressive photographic evidence from the veterinarian side of things to back up the claims. There was even a video of a gentleman that regrew the tip of his finger with this stuff.

The hopes and dreams of thousands of hair transplant patients were about to be realized. The Holy Grail of hair restoration was within sight; the never ending donor supply. Well, I had more down to earth hopes for this technology in that donor wound closures could heal with little to no evidence of surgery. I am sad to report that at this time neither my ambitions nor those more bold ambitions of others have come to pass. It may still yet be something that is beneficial but it is not magic solution.

Now we have PRP therapy. PRP stands for Platelet Rich Plasma and the “therapy” in this new development is the process in which the patient’s blood is drawn, placed into a centrifuge and then the plasma that is separated from the blood is re-injected into the patient’s scalp. The idea here is that a “stem cell” type of reaction occurs in that the patient’s hair follicle will thicken up. Supposedly the PRP will help to stimulate thicker hair growth. So far, to me, the evidence that this is a benefit is not only circumstantial but is outright MIA.

 

 

Lately I’ve been seeing both of these “therapies” thrown around as if they are valid treatments by various clinics. A few clinics even offered PRP within mere DAYS of the buzzwords being introduced to the hair loss online communities. No research was done, no results to validate any efficacy, nothing. But the clinics offering these therapies have no problems charging the patient for the added benefit of these unproven offerings. Sorry, but I think that if one is going to charge hundreds or even thousands of dollars for a treatment they should have consistent results to warrant such fees.

I have seen announcements made as if they are a big deal but in my opinion these announcements of bogus scientific offerings do little more than help to perpetuate the black sheep image that the hair restoration industry has garnered in the medical community. Save your money, people. There are so few things out there that actually do something positive for you hair. The more you listen to these bogus claims the more you will believe them and then of course the more you will buy them. Use your better judgment and of course remember that if it is too good to be true then it most certainly is. Only with CONSISTENT evidence of clearly documented results can you even begin to believe and even then you should still be skeptical.

Related Posts
  • Seattle Hair Transplant Consultations Our consultant in Seattle, Mike Ferko, has his own shiny new website. Mike has an office for Seattle hair transplant and Portland hair transplant clients. Mike is passionate about hair transplantation and can provide a wealth of information. He's always...
  • Dr. Hasson Patient With 3328 Grafts This patient came to see Dr. Hasson for hairline reshaping. Dr. Hasson created a design that was more youthful yet still retained the appropriate temple recession that is necessary for adult males. The patient has fine hair which is very...
  • Lateral Slit Technique by Victor Hasson, MD The following factors are arguably the most important components of hair transplant surgery: Coverage Density Angle Control Naturalness Before analyzing these issues, I should address the issues of density vs. coverage. In the initial assessment of...
  • How Long Till I See Final Results? I think "final" here is a bit misleading because it can mean final growth or final development. By "development" I mean how the hair continues to change in very subtle ways after all the growth has kicked in and gained...
  • Pentagon Using "Acell" Type Procedure to Regrow Muscle Now this is interesting. A few years ago Acell burst onto the scene and had a lot of people excited about the potential for the "unlimited donor supply". As I predicted this never happened but what is interesting is the...
Related Websites
  • Rising Health Care Costs and Medical Billing Despite recent changes to the national health care system, health care costs are rising. Thousands of American’s will find that their costs for both preventative and continuous health care will continue to get higher. The bills are going to keep...
  • H&W Hair Transplant Clinic Facebook Page Hasson & Wong has recently redesigned its Facebook page. The hair transplant clinic's Facebook page includes all hair transplant videos from our YouTube channel — viewable within Facebook — and Facebookers can receive a free hair transplant consultation by answering...
  • Hair Transplant Possible in Patient with Diffuse Alopecia? Good afternoon Dr. Hasson and Dr. Wong, I have a doubts about a hair transplant. I have diffuse alopecia in the upper part of the head. With long hair, I can cover the entire surface with an acceptable result. My...
  • Future of Hair Transplantation I understand that future treatments may compete with current hair transplant techniques, but what do you honestly think of future alternatives—especially for those, who do not have sufficient donor hair to cover their whole balding area? How long do these...
  • Golf Glossary Continued 1 Flat Swing - This is a type of swing that is made with the club swung back while being kept low to the ground, usually starting from the inside and moving outwards, which makes this type of swing likely to...
  • http://bestboarbristlehairbrush.com/ Boar Bristle Hair Brush

    I’m looking for a good quality brush and came across your site. Really cool to acutally find a site that is being updated. Really hard to find sites that are currrent for some reason. Anyways thanks and keep up the good work, bookmarked and will visit again.

  • affiliate millionaire

    Just a quick message 2 thk you 4 your useful webpage. Do you know where I could find more on this? x

  • http://matikamud.tumblr.com Maximilliano

    I so badly need to get myself in gear and startup a blog similar to this one.

  • Bobby

    This is a very negative and ignorant comment on prp. Have you looked at the latest results from the top hair restoration physicians in the US. They are all bathing transplants in acell and seeing dramatic results as well as all but miraculous wound healing. Acell has been so dramatic that just arterial prp and acell combined have been injected without surgery and they are seeing results. I don’t understand why you are so negative and claim to be a patient advocate without looking at what is currently taking place….

  • jotronic

    Ignorant? I think if you look at the time stamp of the original post you’ll see that it was made almost exactly one year ago. The observations I made at the time were relative to the progress of these two procedures in early 2010 so I wouldn’t call it ignorant. However, one year later we have Dr. Cooley and Dr. Hitzig with their new approach on Acell. I think it has promise but I would hardly say that the results are dramatic but “dramatic” is relative. If you think some success is dramatic then more power to you but I think it is merely a good start. Until these results are duplicated on a regular and consistent bases I believe that this approach is not ready to be called dramatic. “Dramatic” to me means it is ready, or almost ready, to replace the surgical option altogether.

    With regards to the “top clinics” bathing transplants I ask you to provide links to photos of these “dramtic” results so that other readers can make their own conclusions. I’m not negative at all about this. I’m simply not blind to the hype generated and I see it for what it is. Excitement over potential not excitement of a proven and solid successor to the surgical option. I know quite a bit about Acell and PRP but as a “patient advocate” I feel it is my duty to keep people thinking straight and not let hype and conjecture over rule reality. I want this to work and I know that eventually we will have at the very least a strong adjunct to current procedures but until this can be replicated with a healthy percentage of growth expected for each treatment I will continue to say that Acell and PRP are unproven.

  • Russell

    Regarding Acell + PRP (without transplantation) to treat hair loss, I agree with you about Acell, PRP, and the combination of both. I think that so far Acell, even when combined with PRP, simply has not thus far lived up to the hope and hype. Admittedly, the docs are trying to “tweak” it and make the treatment better but so far the results are not yet dramatic. Dr. Hitzig’s first before and after pics (two patients) looked like this new treatment might be heading in the right direction as evidenced by the before and after pics of the first two patients in this link:

    http://nyhairloss.com/portfolio/acell-prp-case-studies/

    But his more recent before and after pics of a new patient are not impressive at all. look at photos #4, #5, and #9 in this next link:

    http://www.hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-80307-page-0-category-1-order-last_answer.html

    Even though the hair lengths are different you can still tell there is very little difference in the amount of hair in the part of the scalp that Acell + PRP was injected. I would say that it looks to me like the patient lost hair where the Acell + PRP was injected.

  • Krugger

    Acell and PRP looks like good marketing, its not even in same league if Hanson and Wong had done a transplant a year ago. There would be real coverage not a few new follicles based on these injections.